1) Still life and photography parallel each other in their ability to be straight-forward representations or hold great symbolic meaning. Is one more important or impacting than the other? Or is it simply based on what seems more culturally relevant?
2) Photographs are easy to access and alter with the use of technology. The mutability of images can make possible change to the photographer's intention for a photograph. Does accessibility and reproduction hurt photography as a medium in a fine art context?
3) Fine art and design both have the ability to be emotive, though-provoking, and powerfully impacting. Does the fact that one, at its deepest roots, is driven by profit and consumerism make necessary a greater distinction between art and design?
No comments:
Post a Comment